![]() ![]() That's the same size as the color patches on the IT8 so each patch has to be measured with absolute precision. #Eazydraw independent scale not available Patch# The only problem with that device is the 8mm eye hole. The ColorMunki is up to the task (accurate enough). ![]() Overall, mine reads a bit darker, perhaps because I used a darker backing when measuring. The data files are comparable and they produce very similar profiles. Being at least 15 years old, (although stored in a cool, dark place) I question whether the data files for them are still accurate. Just out of curiosity Mike, how much different were the values you read with your spectrophotometer versus the values supplied by Wolf-Faust? Do you think that a ColorMunki would be up to the task of spot-reading patches from an IT-8? My original from you is getting pretty old and scratched up, but I acquired a couple from stuff packaged with old AGFA flatbed scanners that are in near pristeen condition. This will be an file which he will supply with any target purchased from this batch and subsequent batches of targets. Mike has a Spectrophotometer ( a big word for rectal thermometer) which adds perfection to the TXT file that comes with the target. It naturally and usually comes with a TXT file with the same number that should show in the Profile Prism working window. Mike's latest batch of IT-8 targets are from a batch that carries the (R130730) Charge number. These text files tweak the IT-8 for accuracy. TXT files which have the same number as the Target. Then came the IT-8 with many many more patches for accuracy. #Eazydraw independent scale not available Patch#. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |